We represented Motorola in a swimsuit against Apple in which each party accused the other of infringing patents thought of important to the follow of cellular and wifi requirements. Sitting by designation within the district court docket, Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner granted summary judgment concerning some patents and dismissed the remaining claims on the bottom that both sides’ damages experts had been excluded and that injunctive relief was not available. On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed several favorable claim constructions, reversed the exclusion of Motorola’s major damages expert, and held that there is not any per se rule barring injunctions for standards important patents. On behalf of our consumer Samsung, we obtained a landmark victory in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., the first design-patent case to achieve the Supreme Court in over a century. A federal jury had awarded Apple $399 million—the whole income on Samsung’s accused Galaxy phones—for supposed design-patent infringement of certain narrow portions of an iPhone’s look. After efficiently petitioning for certiorari, we obtained a stunning 8-0 reversal vacating that award and adopting Samsung’s argument that, in a multicomponent device, infringer’s income beneath Section 289 of the Patent Act are limited to income from the component to which the patented design is applied.


In sum, the attorneys in Wilson Sonsini’s Supreme Court and Appellate follow argue masterfully, write superbly, are a pleasure to work with, and can handle any attraction in any court docket, whatever the stakes. Co. v. Tyco Healthcare(Fed Cir. 2014), reversing summary judgment for the counterclaim defendant and holding that a generic drug maker could problem the submitting of a patent lawsuit under the “sham litigation” exception toNoerr-Penningtonantitrust immunity. Gore & Assocs.(Fed. Cir. 2015),holding that Bard was entitled to $371 million in enhanced damages for willful patent infringement in a case resolving a long time of litigation and raising issues of standing, legislation of the case, and issue preclusion in addition to substantive patent law.


In addition, the Legal Policy Group supplies authorized and coverage help on legislative matters, engaged on testimony, participating in briefings of Congressional staff, and responding to Congressional correspondence. Each year, we brief and argue federal appeals in each regional circuit, the D.C. Circuit, the Federal Circuit, and dozens of state courts of appeals—averaging one appeal roughly each three enterprise days. UBS for over 15 years in multiple class action litigations alleging billions of dollars in losses stemming from Enron’s 2001 collapse, together with because it prevailed before the united states Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit which upheld two ultimate dismissals in 2018 and 2019, bringing to a close what may be the last Enron-related litigation. The government’s coverage is to discharge or deny enlistment to anyone who will not serve in the gender to which they have been assigned at delivery, or who’s present process hormone remedy or different gender-confirmation procedures.

Prevailed in the trial courtroom and obtained a decision in one case and a dismissal in the second. Also illustration of the acquirer on appeal towards challenges by an objecting and intervening shareholder.In re Compuware Shareholder Litigation and Karmanos v. Bedi et al. The mailing of this email just isn’t meant to create, and receipt of it doesn’t represent, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you just send to anybody at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged until we’ve agreed to symbolize you. If you send this e mail, you confirm that you have learn and understand this notice.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply