Lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed; therefore inclusion inBest Lawyersis thought of a singular honor. Our M&A practice group consists of skilled transactional attorneys targeted on handling the complexities of M&A transactions. We take pride in working closely with our purchasers at every stage of the method, from pre-transaction preparation and deal structuring to find a way to maximize worth and minimize danger, by way of due diligence, to drafting and negotiating definitive agreements, and finally to closing and post-closing recommendation.

Richard Birns And Theodore Olson Named Sports Law Energy Players

Our agency is among the few firms in North Carolina that provides full-service legal representation in government contracting issues. The principal members of our Government Contracting follow group, Ben Thompson and Jenna Borders, have a combined 44 years of expertise in handling government contracting matters. For over 40 years, we’ve helped founders, start-ups, and emerging corporations form, finance, and develop their companies, and have assisted numerous angel investors and enterprise capital corporations with their investment activities. Every profitable enterprise will encounter legal disputes and related challenges. Our Commercial Litigation apply group strives to handle such disputes in essentially the most strategic and efficient manner potential to realize a optimistic end result for our purchasers.

How Can The World’s Largest Law Agency Assist You To At Present ?

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to reverse a $34 million judgment after jury trial in a reinsurance dispute. After a jury had found AIG responsible for fraudulently inducing the plaintiff to enter into six reinsurance agreements, the district court had rescinded the agreements and ordered AIG to pay over $34 million, including $5.75 million in punitive damages. We obtained a $70 million post-trial victory, affirmed on appeal to the Federal Circuit, in a fraud case based mostly on allegations that our consumer Cisco had delayed telling plaintiff XpertUniverse that a partnership utility had been denied. After a jury awarded $70 million in damages, Cisco retained us for post-trial motions and appeal. We persuaded both the district court and the Federal Circuit that the evidence had been inadequate to assist the award, and thus to enter and affirm judgment as a matter of regulation for Cisco.

Leave a Reply